{"id":1125,"date":"2014-12-19T18:42:21","date_gmt":"2014-12-19T23:42:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tambulimedia.com\/?p=1125"},"modified":"2023-07-24T15:07:42","modified_gmt":"2023-07-24T19:07:42","slug":"eskrima-disarms-dangerous-assumptions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tambulimedia.com\/eskrima-disarms-dangerous-assumptions\/","title":{"rendered":"Eskrima Disarms: Dangerous Assumptions"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Fill-5\"<\/a>The book Mastering Eskrima Disarms<\/a><\/em><\/strong> sets out the theory, principles, strategies, and methods of four modes of disarms applied in Filipino martial arts. It then offers several dozen masters and grandmasters demonstrating their disarming techniques most used in their styles. It is the most thorough book available on the topic.<\/p>\n

In this post, we are sharing the section of the book that\u00a0looks at some of the dangerous assumptions some students and practitioners bring to the application of their disarms. By becoming aware of these, you can recognize their existence and then do your best to avoid them in your training. In the end, you react in real life as you train in class.<\/p>\n

It is fair to say that the majority of disarming techniques taught in eskrima are applied in medium range. The obvious reason is that there simply are more defensive counter techniques in this range than the others. As a result, it is quite common for practitioners unwittingly to (mis)execute disarming techniques meant for either long range or close range, while they are in medium range. This accounts for why one\u2019s disarm is countered or made ineffective against an opponent who is resisting or who has mastered range control. It\u2019s dangerous to assume that all<\/em> disarms are effective in more than one range. They are not.<\/p>\n

\"Fill-9\"<\/a>Be careful also not to assert that all disarming techniques must be \u201ctight.\u201d While this is true to an extent, tight <\/em>is a relative concept<\/em> and is not indicative of a technique\u2019s safety or effectiveness. Tightening the action <\/em>of a disarming technique is often necessary to control the opponent\u2019s weapon-holding limb, but being tighter-in<\/em> or closer<\/em> to the opponent can leave you in range of his second hand. Only when a disarm is done in the proper range and gate and with the appropriate opponent structural control, is it time to consider whether or not it should be tighter<\/em>. Never put one concept (like \u201ctightness\u201d) above all others. Nothing happens in a vacuum. Concepts as a group are the scaffolding that give structure and strength to every technique, and one individual concept does not make a scaffold.<\/p>\n

Many styles teach disarms as techniques that follow technical steps, like (for example) block the weapon, twist the arm, release the weapon. But there is much more to disarms than that. This method, by itself, brings too many assumptions to the encounter. It assumes that the practitioner was able to due four things: 1) maneuver into correct range; 2) stop the full force of the opponent\u2019s strike; 3) prevent the opponent from resisting; and 4) keep the opponent from countering with his second hand or weapon. Those four assumptions are far too many to bring to an encounter with an armed assailant. It is important to understand that the disarming technique itself is not all you need to focus on and master. It is only the \u201cshell\u201d of the overall technique. Disarming techniques are the \u201cmain event,\u201d but without the supporting structures there is nothing to support the disarm to make it both safe and effective in real time and under real circumstances.<\/p>\n

To be both safe and effective against an opponent who is trying to hurt you and not let go of his weapon, there is a basic sequences of disarming action. This sequence is:<\/p>\n